Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Penalty u/s 271B

GYAN JAIN

My assessee is p ltd co , in the year FY 2002-2003 the co fail to get accounts audited bacause the co has filed the pettion for removal of auditor before Regional director department of company affairs and permisiion not received , no new auditor accepted the audit before NOC from previous auditor and the co is failed to gets acounts audit in time and submit the Income tax retrun , the Ao imposed penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the appeal is pending before CIT appeal. suggest me and give me full citation of Case Laws avlaible

Company Faces Penalty Under Sec 271B for Late Tax Filing; Possible Relief Under Sec 273B Suggested A private limited company failed to get its accounts audited for the fiscal year 2002-2003 due to a pending petition for auditor removal and the lack of a No Objection Certificate from the previous auditor. As a result, the company could not submit its income tax return on time, leading to a penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal is pending before the CIT. A respondent suggested referring to section 273B for relief due to reasonable cause and recommended reviewing relevant case laws for further guidance. Another respondent encouraged the original poster to share their own insights. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues