Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Power of STO

BAL KRISHAN GARG

BRIEF FACTS : ORI.RET.FILED ON 27/5/08 FOR APRIL,08 CLAIMING REFUND RS.2,97,498 AND REVISED RET.FILED ON 3/11/08 CLAIMING 3,47,498 AS REFUND STO ADVISE TO GO TO DY.COMM.FOR OBJECTION U/S 74 AND OBJECTION FILED AND PASSED.BUT THE DY.COM.HAS MENTIONED IN ORDER ONLY ORI.RET.AND PASSED AS 50,000 TO BE ADJUSTED IN SUBSQUENT TAX PERIOD AGAINST A MISSED INVOICE IN ORIGINAL RET.NOW STO IS NOT CLEAR AS DY.COM.HAS NOT MENTIONED IN ORDER REL.TO REVISE RET.MY QUESTION IS WHETHER THE STO CAN GRANT REFUND 2,97,498 AS A REFUND AND ALLOW US TO SET OFF RS.50,000 IN ANOTHER TAX PERIOD . HERE STO IS NOT CLEAR ? PLEASE CLARIFY

Service Tax Refund Dispute: Clarification Sought on Adjusting Rs. 50,000 Against Original Refund Order by Deputy Commissioner. An individual raised a query regarding a service tax refund issue. They initially filed a return claiming a refund of Rs. 2,97,498, later revised to Rs. 3,47,498. The Sales Tax Officer (STO) advised filing an objection with the Deputy Commissioner (Dy. Comm.), who passed an order referencing only the original return and allowed a Rs. 50,000 adjustment for a missed invoice. The individual sought clarification on whether the STO could grant the original refund and adjust Rs. 50,000 in a subsequent tax period. A respondent advised seeking clarification from the authority, as the STO cannot amend the Dy. Comm.'s order. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues