Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 120690
Like 0 Bookmark

SECTION 171 - ANTI PROFITEERING

Date 03 Jan 2026
Replies 8 Replies
Views 1209 Views
Builder absorbing GST by reducing total price generally satisfies anti profiteering if tax/ITC benefits are passed to buyers.
Absorbing GST and reducing the total consideration by the tax amount ordinarily satisfies the commensurate reduction requirement under Section 171, provided the tax or ITC benefit has actually been passed to buyers; regulators will examine timing of supply, contract pricing (inclusive/exclusive), ITC claims, base price changes and whether any post supply tax or ITC benefit was retained by the supplier. (AI Summary)

M/s XYZ Partnership firm unregistered in erstwhile act, but registered in GST as Builder enters to agreement with 2 flat buyers before GST and 3 flat buyers post GST with 100+GST for each flat..

But due to anti profiteering norms they offered discount to these flat buyers by the GST amount by charging just 100(inclusive of GST)

So, had he violated the provision of section 171 of the CGST Act?? Can you help me to quote any case law as because 171 is just commensurate reduction in prices and the price has been reduced by absorbing the gst amount in the offered rate.

8 answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide

No Replies are present.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues