Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

ITC ON SOLAR PLANT - GST CENTRAL AUDIT TEAM WANT TO REVERSED AND CHARGE INTEREST

RAVI MUNDRA

We installed a solar power system at our manufacturing plant in the 2020-21 financial year. During a recent GST audit, the department has raised an objection and is demanding a reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed on this solar installation. What potential grounds might the GST department be citing for this ITC reversal, and what would be the best course of action/solution to defend our ITC claim or minimize any potential liability?

 

Manufacturer defends solar power system ITC claim under Section 17 against department's immovable property argument A manufacturer installed a solar power system at their plant in 2020-21 and claimed Input Tax Credit (ITC). During a GST audit, the department demanded ITC reversal, citing Section 17(5)(d) of CGST Act 2017, which restricts ITC on goods used for constructing immovable property. The department argued solar installations constitute immovable property, making ITC ineligible. Legal experts advised that solar systems qualify as 'plant and machinery' under Section 17's explanation when used for captive power generation supporting taxable manufacturing activities. The Solex Energy Ltd. v. State of Gujarat case supports this position. To defend the claim, the manufacturer should provide evidence showing the system is capitalized as plant and machinery, including vendor invoices, CA certifications, asset registers, and consumption data linking power generation to manufacturing. The department also referenced a Tamil Nadu AAR ruling denying ITC where electricity supply is exempt from GST. However, multiple AAR decisions provide varying interpretations based on specific facts and circumstances, offering persuasive value for defense strategies. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues