Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Does Section 40(a)(ia) cover cases of short deduction of TDS?

Ramanathan Seshan

Dear Experts,

Since the proviso states that disallowance applies where 'an assessee fails to deduct the whole or any part of the tax' under Chapter XVII-B, can short deduction be considered a failure to deduct, thereby attracting disallowance under this section?

Regards,

S Ram

Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance applies to short TDS deduction cases per Kerala High Court despite conflicting rulings A tax practitioner inquired whether Section 40(a)(ia) covers cases of short deduction of TDS, questioning if partial deduction failures attract disallowance under the provision's language about failing to deduct 'whole or any part' of tax under Chapter XVII-B. A respondent noted conflicting High Court decisions: Calcutta and Delhi High Courts ruled disallowance doesn't apply to short-deduction cases, while Kerala High Court held that disallowance applies to short-deduction since the section references tax deductible under appropriate Chapter XVII-B provisions. The original querist acknowledged the response but noted courts haven't thoroughly examined the provisos, suggesting the main section typically prevails over provisos in interpretation. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues