Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Reversal of Input on damaged goods

Shrikanth Parmarthy

dear experts,

There are transfer of goods from plants located in Andhra Pradesh to Sales office located in Karnataka through Stock transfer by paying IGST. ITC on those goods was claimed. Some goods were found damaged on receipt at Karnataka sales office. The same goods were transferred back to plant located in AP by paying IGST so that same can be scrapped or reused. Karnataka GST officer is asking to reverse the ITC as per provisions of the act. Our contention is' as we have already paid outward tax there is no loss to GST department'. Is our view correct. Kindly provide your views in this regard.

Goods Transfer and Tax Credit Dispute: Company Successfully Challenges Input Tax Credit Reversal Under GST Regulations A company transferred goods from Andhra Pradesh to Karnataka, claiming input tax credit. Some goods were damaged and returned to the original plant for scrapping or reuse by paying IGST. The Karnataka GST officer demanded ITC reversal under Section 17(5)(h), but forum experts argued that this provision does not apply since the goods were not destroyed and a taxable supply invoice was raised for the return. The company successfully convinced the officer using the provided legal reasoning. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues