Dear Members
Adding to the above, it may be noted that originally the compliance with condition specified under section 15(3)(b)(ii) of the CGST Act was, impliedly, based upon 'matching principle' envisaged in section 43 of the CGST Act. In other words, the condition regarding reversal of ITC by recipient was expected to be shown as satisfied once matching happens on common portal i.e., details of credit notes furnished by supplier stands matched with claim for reversal of ITC by recipient (credit notes auto-populated in GSTR-2A are accepted by recipient).
However, due to non-operationalisation of said matching concept, technicalities are seen arising during assessment proceedings wherein demands towards Output Tax Liability reduced on account of issuance of credit notes are being confirmed for want of proof of reversal of ITC by recipient. Prima-facie this requirement is hit by doctrine of impossibility but assessment orders are not being passed in favour of the assessee.
CBIC came out with a Circular No. 212/06/2024-GST dated 26.06.2024 wherein it has been admitted that requisite facilities were not made available and then, it has been clarified that in cases where ITC is above Rs. 5,00,000/-, supplier may procure CA Certificate from recipients stating that ITC has been reversed by recipient. Astonishingly, said Circular dated 26.06.2024 has clarified the similar requirement even for past cases. To Quote:
"2.3. However, there is no system functionality/ facility presently available on the common portal to enable the supplier or the tax officer to verify the compliance of the said condition of proportionate reversal of input tax credit by the recipient.
.......
2.8. ...........Even for the past period, where ever any such evidence as per section 15(3)(b)(ii) of CGST Act in respect of credit note issued by the supplier for post-sale discounts is required to be produced by him to the tax authorities, the concerned taxpayer may procure and provide such certificates issued by CA/CMA or the undertakings/ certificates issued by the recipients of supply, as the case may be, to the concerned investigating/audit/adjudicating authority as evidence of requisite reversal of input tax credit by his recipients."
Equally important is to take note of amendments made in section 34(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 by Finance Act, 2025 which reads as under:
Provided that no reduction in output tax liability of the supplier shall be permitted, if the––
(i) input tax credit as is attributable to such a credit note, if availed, has not been reversed by the recipient, where such recipient is a registered person; or
(ii) incidence of tax on such supply has been passed on to any other person, in other cases.”.
Therefore, for the past periods (atleast prior to Circular dated 26.06.2024), demands in such type cases are legally not sustainable because it is not a supplier's function to ensure compliance with legal requirement for reversal of ITC by recipient at recipient's end.
Hope the above clarifies.
Best Regards
Adv. Kashish Gupta (85108 06440)