Your query raises nuanced legal and tax issues under Indian GST law concerning:
- Carried interest paid to the new Investment Manager (IM) B,
- The nature of this payment — whether it is a return on investment or a supply of service, and
- Whether it may qualify as an actionable claim (and hence, outside GST scope).
Let’s address each aspect within the legal framework.
✅ Background Summary
- A was both Sponsor and Investment Manager (IM) of the AIF till August 2023.
- From August 2023, IM was changed from A to B.
- A remains the Sponsor (i.e., capital contributor).
- B (new IM):
- Receives carried interest from the Fund — 100% of profits on redemption of units, linked to fund performance.
- Also receives fixed management fees (unconditionally, not linked to performance).
🔍 Issue: Is carried interest paid to IM B liable to GST, or is it a return on investment or an actionable claim (hence not taxable)?
⚖️ Legal Analysis Under GST Law
🔹 1. Management Fees vs. Carried Interest
Component | GST Applicability | Reasoning |
Management Fees | ✅ Taxable @ 18% (SAC 997152 – Fund Management Services) | It is a fixed, contractual fee for fund management — falls squarely under “supply of service” per Section 7 of CGST Act. |
Carried Interest | ⚠️ Contested – Depends on structure | The nature of carried interest determines taxability — whether it is: (a) return on investment, or (b) performance-linked remuneration. |
🔹 2. What is Carried Interest?
Carried interest is typically a share of the fund’s profits (usually 20%) given to the IM/sponsor once investors receive a minimum return (hurdle rate). It is performance-based, often seen as remuneration, not investment return, unless contractually structured otherwise.
🔍 If IM B has not contributed capital, but receives profits only as a function of its role as fund manager, then carried interest = reward for services rendered, and is taxable under GST.
🔹 3. Return on Investment – Exempt from GST?
If the carried interest is structured as a return on actual capital contributed by IM B (i.e., equity investment), then it may be viewed as capital appreciation — not a supply under GST.
However, in your case:
- IM B did not make any capital contribution (as per facts).
- IM B receives fixed fees + performance-based share.
👉 This indicates that carried interest is compensation for fund management, and not investment income.
Hence, it will be taxable under GST as part of composite or mixed supply of fund management services.
🔹 4. Can Carried Interest Be Treated as an Actionable Claim?
An “actionable claim” is defined in Section 2(1) of CGST Act and excluded from the scope of supply except for lottery, betting, and gambling.
To qualify, the payment must represent a right to a debt not yet realized, transferable by action (suit). Courts have typically interpreted this narrowly.
Carried interest does not fall within this scope, because:
- It is not a debt owed.
- It is a share in future profits, dependent on performance.
- It arises from a contractual service arrangement, not a claim enforceable under general civil law.
📌 Hence, carried interest is not an actionable claim, and cannot escape GST on that basis.
🧾 Judicial/Industry Reference:
- Circular No. 102/21/2019-GST clarified that performance-based incentives paid to mutual fund distributors are taxable, even if linked to fund’s performance.
- Similar logic applies to carried interest — if paid for fund management functions, it’s consideration for services, not investment income.
✅ Conclusion:
🔹 Carried interest paid to IM B is taxable under GST, as it constitutes consideration for fund management services, not a return on investment.
🔹 It does not qualify as an actionable claim.
🔹 Fixed management fees are separately and clearly taxable.
🔹 IM B must charge GST on the carried interest portion under SAC 997152 at 18%.
Disclaimer -This discussion is only for the knowledge enrichment and does not constitute any Legal Opinion in any manner.
***