Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Concept of 'under protest'

KASTURI SETHI

Dear Experts,

Does the concept of ''under protest' exist in GST regime ? In my view, it exists because saving Section 174 of CGST Act covers Central Excise Act & Rules. Moreover, this concept is included in the scope of Principles of Natural Justice.

There is FAQ which says there is no concept of 'under protest'. FAQ has no statutory force.

Pl. enlighten me on the issue.

Thanks & regards.

Section 174 CGST Act Upholds Validity of 'Under Protest' Payments to Trigger Reassessment The concept of 'under protest' is recognized in the GST regime, supported by Section 174 of the CGST Act, which preserves provisions from the Central Excise Act and aligns with principles of natural justice. Although some FAQs state there is no such concept, these lack statutory authority. Judicial decisions affirm that marking a protest during duty payment signals the department that the payment is not voluntary, preventing finalization of assessment and necessitating reassessment proceedings. Tribunals have held that such protests inform authorities to initiate reassessment and issue a speaking order, reinforcing the legitimacy of 'under protest' payments under GST and customs laws. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues