Just a moment...
Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?
Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?
All Issues
of 
Dear Experts,
Can any one throw light on the meaning and scope of self-plagiarism ? I want reply in detail with examples. Whether it is suable ? if so, under which Section of Copyright Act ? I have read about it in a book but it was too brief to grasp.
Thanks a lot.
of 
Dear Sir,
Certainly! Let's break down the concept of self-plagiarism in detail, explore its scope with examples, and understand whether it is legally actionable (suable) under Indian copyright law or any other relevant statutes.
🔍 What is Self-Plagiarism?
Self-plagiarism is the practice of reusing one’s own previously published work or submitting the same work across multiple platformswithout proper disclosure or permission (if rights were transferred).
Unlike traditional plagiarism — where someone copies another person’s work without credit — self-plagiarism involves recycling one's own intellectual content in a way that misleads the audience or violates publishing ethics or contractual obligations.
🧠 Types & Examples of Self-Plagiarism:
1. Duplicate Publication
Publishing the same research paper, article, or creative work in two or more journals or platforms without proper citation or acknowledgment of the original.
Example:
Dr. A writes a paper titled “Climate Change and Indian Agriculture” and publishes it in Journal A. A year later, she submits the same paper — or slightly edited — to Journal B without disclosing the previous publication.
2. Text Recycling or “Salami Slicing”
Using large portions of previously written work (including literature reviews, methods, results, etc.) in a new publication without citation, often to inflate publication count.
Example:
A researcher divides a comprehensive study into smaller parts and publishes them as different papers, each containing overlapping content, without cross-referencing.
3. Republishing Content in Books or Theses
Including previously published material in a book, dissertation, or thesis without citation or acknowledgment of prior publication.
Example:
An author compiles previously published articles into a book, presenting them as original work in the book without disclosure.
⚖️ Is Self-Plagiarism Illegal or Just Unethical?
This is a nuanced question. Let's explore it from both academic/publishing ethics and legal (especially Indian) perspectives.
📚 Academic and Publishing Ethics:
In academia, UGC and other institutions in India strictly prohibit self-plagiarism:
In publishing, most journals require authors to declare previous publications or related submissions. Violating these terms can result in:
⚖️ Under Indian Copyright Law (Copyright Act, 1957)
Is self-plagiarism suable under copyright law?
Yes — conditionally. It can be suable, but not merely because of the act of reusing content. It becomes a legal issue when copyright has been transferred or contractual obligations are breached.
✅ Situations Where Self-Plagiarism May Be Suable:
1. Breach of Copyright Assignment (Section 18–19 of the Copyright Act)
When an author assigns copyright of their work (e.g., to a journal or publisher), they no longer hold exclusive rights. Republishing the same content elsewhere without permission is a copyright violation, even though the author is the original creator.
Example:
If a researcher gives exclusive rights of a paper to Journal A and then publishes the same article in Journal B, they can be sued by Journal A for copyright infringement, under Section 51 of the Copyright Act.
2. Breach of Contract
If an author signs a publishing agreement that includes a clause preventing republication or requiring disclosure of prior work, violation of such terms may lead to a civil suit under contract law, even if not under copyright law per se.
🔴 What Self-Plagiarism Is Not (Common Misunderstandings):
🌍 Global Context:
✅ Key Takeaways:
Aspect | Legal Status in India |
Reusing own work without transferring rights | Not suable |
Reusing own work after transferring copyright | Suable under Section 51 |
Violating contract or publisher agreement | Suable under contract law |
Ethical violation in academia | Punishable under UGC regulations |
📌 Final Thoughts:
Self-plagiarism lies at the intersection of ethics, law, and academic integrity. While it may not always be a punishable offence under copyright law, it can easily become suable if it involves a copyright transfer, contract breach, or fraudulent intent.
Hence, proper disclosure, permission from copyright holders, and clear referencing are essential safeguards.
Resources/Reference for further reading: -
https://www.aje.com/arc/self-plagiarism-how-to-define-it-and-why-to-avoid-it/
https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_self-plagiarism3
https://blog.ipleaders.in/plagiarism-law-india/
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/intellectual-property-rights-and-plagiarismpptx/265893124
https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/107?locale=en_US
https://www.cibnp.com/self-plagiarism-what-it-is-and-how-to-avoid-it/
*** ***
An eye opener for the so called authors.
🔍 Brainstorming Questions on Self-Plagiarism and IPRs.
What is the role of Artificial Intelligence in the context of self-plagiarism and intellectual property rights?
(How does AI contribute to or complicate the understanding and identification of self-plagiarism?)
Has the advent of AI technologies diluted or redefined the traditional concept of infringement under Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs)?
When self-plagiarism contributes to societal benefit — such as enhancing public knowledge, simplifying complex issues, or enabling the development of life-saving pharmaceutical formulas — should it still be viewed as a violation under IPR law?
Can the reuse of one’s own prior work, if intended for educational, scientific, or humanitarian advancement, be justified as non-infringing under the broader framework of public interest?
Should intellectual property law evolve to accommodate ethical self-reuse in specific domains, especially in academia and life sciences?
***
.jpg){kind=small}
M/s. Yagay and Sun,
Dear Sirs, I am highly thankful to your for your comprehensive and topmost reply. You have devoted your precious time for me.
Deepest and warmest regards from the core of my heart.
K.L.SETHI
Dear Sir,
You always write as YAGAY and SUN. Should it not be as YAGAY and SUN'? Why SUN is annexed to ''and'' ?
Just curious to know.
Clarification on the Name “YAGAY AND SUN”
The name “YAGAY AND SUN” has been conceived with profound symbolic significance rooted in ancient Vedic and scientific principles:
It is brought to attention that there appears to be a technical Snag on the website, wherein the intended name is being incorrectly depicted as “YAGAY AND SUN.” This formatting discrepancy may distort the intended meaning and should be rectified to preserve the conceptual integrity of the name.
The choice of this unique name reflects my personal vision and commitment to serving the people of our country (INDIA) by sharing knowledge and experience for the enrichment of public understanding across disciplines.
'JAI HIND'
Dear Sir
This is really the great thought blending eternal Indian philosophy, solar system and the modern business ecosystem. Let these thoughts convert into reality on a daily basis with new horizon.
Wishing you a grand success in your endeavour. We are with you to achieve the noble mission selflessly.
M/s.Yagay and Sun,
Dear Sirs, I am all praise for your noble cause. This is the rarest of rare virtue in this materialistic world.
Why have not you preferred the word, 'BHARAT': to 'ÍNDIA' ?
As per the Constitution of India, the official name of the country is:
"India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States."
— Article 1(1), Constitution of India
Explanation:
There has been ongoing public and political discourse on whether to prioritize one name over the other, but as per the current Constitution, both "India" and "Bharat" are legally recognized names of the country.
***
of 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 