Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Demand confirmed under section 73(1)of finance act 1994

Sudhir Kumar

The department has confirmed the demand under section 73(1) in place of 73(2) of the Finance act 1994 while the SCN has been issued under same section. No corrigendum has been issued by the department.

Can it be valid ground to challenge the order in court to set aside the order in original as it has been confirmed under wrong section

Please suggest.

Service Tax Demand: Procedural Technicalities Cannot Override Substantive Legal Intent Under Section 73 A discussion forum explored the legal nuance of service tax demand confirmation under Section 73(1) versus 73(2) of the Finance Act 1994. Participants analyzed whether a technical section reference error could invalidate an official order. Consensus emerged that procedural minor errors do not automatically nullify administrative actions, particularly when the substantive legal intent remains consistent and no prejudice is caused to the involved party. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues