Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

File SPL 02 Without DRC 03 A .

Sharad Singh

A taxpayer made payment by DRC 03 and files SPL-02 afterwards without DRC-03A. Will it be considered as payment? What will happen to such SPL-02 application. Now taxpayer can not make DRC-03 a as system doesn't allow it.

GST Payment Made via DRC-03 Without Filing DRC-03A: Procedural Lapse or Substantial Compliance Under Rule 142(2B)? A taxpayer made GST payment via DRC-03 but filed SPL-02 without submitting mandatory DRC-03A to link the payment. While the payment was made within the due date (31-03-2025), the system now prevents filing DRC-03A. Two perspectives emerged: some experts maintain this constitutes incomplete compliance as Form DRC-03A is legally required under Rule 142(2B) and Rule 164(2) to reconcile payments with demands in the Electronic Liability Register. Others argue the taxpayer has a valid case based on substantive compliance doctrine, as the tax amount was remitted on time and the missing DRC-03A is merely procedural, suggesting litigation may be the only remaining option. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues