Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Corporate Bank Guarantee

SUBHASISH SARKAR

A Corporate Bank Guarantee has been issued by the Holding Company located in London UK on behalf of its subsidiary in India for availing Working Capital facilities in 2013. My query is, whether GST is applicable in case of BG is issued by an Overseas Entity for its subsidiary in India, whether ITC is available to the beneficiary, ie, the subsidiary, and how invoice will be raised to avail ITC. Also, Whether GST applicable under Rule 28(2) wef 26-10-2023 @ 18% of 1% of BG value for 2023-2024 and every FY thereafter. How will the value be determined prior to 26-10-2023 under rule 28.

Corporate Bank Guarantee GST Applicability and ITC Impact Explored Under Rule 28(2) Amendments Effective October 2023 A corporate bank guarantee issued by a UK-based holding company for its Indian subsidiary raises questions about GST applicability and input tax credit (ITC) availability. The main concerns include whether GST applies to such guarantees, how invoices should be raised for ITC, and the impact of Rule 28(2) effective from October 26, 2023. Responses suggest that before the rule amendment, there might be no GST liability, and full credit eligibility negates the need for an invoice. Interest on delayed GST payment is implied, and recent notifications clarify the inapplicability of Rule 28(2) if full ITC is available. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues