Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

SIGNIFICANCE OF FORM GST APL-02

Sadanand Bulbule

Dear experts

Section 107 of the CGST Act provides an aggrieved person a right to file an appeal against any decision or order so passed by an adjudicating authority. The general upper time limit to file an appeal is three months from the date on which the said decision or is communicated to such person under Section 107(1) and another one month under Section 107(4) with condonation of delay.

Further in terms of Rule 108(3), a final acknowledgment shall be issued in FORM GST APL-02 by the FAA. Serial number 7 of FORM GST APL-02 reads as under:

7. Date of acceptance/rejection of appeal-

So once the appeal petition is accepted and posted for hearing by the FAA, it means prima facie it is free from all defects. That being the position, can FAA reject such appeal for the reason that it is time barred or filed beyond four months while disposing such appeal under Section 107[11]?

Assuming FAA is right in this regard, then what is the significance of indicating the acceptance of appeal by way of FORM GST APL-02and then rejecting it after hearing under Section 107[11]? Is such rejection justifiable while disposing appeal rather than at the stage of initial scrutiny of appeal before issuing final acknowledgement in FORM GST APL-02?

Normally, aggrieved person is under the bona fide impression that, once a final acknowledgement is issued in FORM GST APL-02, the appeal filed by him is free from all defects. Examination of grounds is altogether a different segment for disposal of appeal.

Who is right and who is wrong in this case is the core issue in the subject query.

Experts to throw light to clear the doubts in the interest of such aggrieved persons.

Can the First Appellate Authority Reject a GST Appeal as Time-Barred After Issuing FORM GST APL-02? A discussion in a forum addresses the significance of FORM GST APL-02 in the context of appeals under the GST framework. An individual questions whether the First Appellate Authority (FAA) can reject an appeal as time-barred after issuing FORM GST APL-02, which signifies acceptance of the appeal. The discussion highlights discrepancies in the communication date of an adjudication order, affecting the appeal's timeliness. Participants debate the FAA's role in acknowledging appeals and whether rejections based on timing are justified. They also explore the potential for rectification under Section 161 and discuss relevant legal precedents and case laws supporting the appellant's position. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Sadanand Bulbule on Feb 14, 2025

Plz refer the following for interim information:

2025 (2) TMI 550 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT - KAMALA STORES & ANR. VERSUS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

To be continued......

KASTURI SETHI on Feb 14, 2025

Sh.Sadanand Bulbule Ji,

Sir, I am not aware of the full facts and circumstances of the issue.

(i) What is the date of communication of the Adjudication Order and how the appeal is time barred ? What is mode of service of the Adjudication Order ?

(ii) I think that the word, ''Prima Facie" is the determinant factor here. Any person can rectify his/her mistake at any stage provided that it is not too late to achieve the desired goal within time limit prescribed as per GST laws.

Sadanand Bulbule on Feb 14, 2025

Dear Sir

The order dated 23/02/2023 passed by the adjudicating authority has been communicated to the taxpayer on 19/05/2023 as per the GSTN Portal indicating relevant Ref ID. Accordingly appeal was filed on 26/07/2023 which was well within the time stipulated under Section 107[1]. The appellant has satisfactory portal proof of communication order to him on 19/05/2023.

Shockingly the FAA records that the said order was uploaded on 24/02/2023. Hence appeal filed on 26/07/2023 was time barred in terms of Section 107[4]. Even during personal hearing conducted on three different days, this issue was never raised by the FAA.

Under such peculiar factual situation, is the order passed by the FAA rejecting the appeal justifiable? Is it not a fit case for rectification under Section 161?

Plz comment.

KASTURI SETHI on Feb 14, 2025

Sh.Sadanand Bulbule Ji,

Sir, In my view the department will not go for rectification under Section 161 of the Act.

It is my humble suggestion that you should penetrate into the meaning and sense of the term, "the date of communication". Communication is not one-way traffic. The communication means when the recipient/registered person/noticee  comes to know about the notice/order etc.

Sir, Only appeal is the solution. 

Sadanand Bulbule on Feb 14, 2025

Sir, it’s a meaningful suggestion. I shall explore the best possibilities. Thank you so much. 

Sadanand Bulbule on Feb 14, 2025

Dear all

Plz refer the following:

In Pushpam Reality v. State Tax Officer 2022 (3) TMI 86 - MADRAS HIGH COURT, it was observed that GST Act was implemented in the year 2017 with effect from 01.07.2017. The web portal maintained by GST has faced problems on several occasions and steps were taken for correcting the technical glitches. Even as on date, there are problems arising out of intercommunication between the State GST and Central GST and the web portal which has to be resolved.

The respondents can therefore continue the service of notice through registered post or speed post or courier with acknowledgment to the petitioners at their last known place of business or residence and upload the same in the web portal. Till all problems are resolved on the technical side, the authority may simultaneously serve the notice of assessment and communications under the Act and Rules both through registered post or speed post or courier with acknowledgment as is contemplated Section 169(1)(b) of the Act and through web portal.

Sadanand Bulbule on Feb 14, 2025
KASTURI SETHI on Feb 14, 2025

Sh. Sadanand Bulbule Ji,

Sir,

(i) So you have started exploring the relevant legal material in favour of the tax payers/Noticees.

(ii) Here is an other case law which is in favour of the tax-payers/Noticees : 2021 (377) ELT 895 (Tri. Chennai) in the case of R. Ravichandran Vs. Commissioner of Customs Chennai. - 2021 (5) TMI 209 - CESTAT CHENNAI.

(iii) As per EXCUS this judgement has been accepted by the department.

KASTURI SETHI on Feb 15, 2025

Dear Sir,

Here is the latest judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Joint Commissioner Vs. S.K. Chakraborty and Sons reported as 2025 (2) TMI 672 - SC ORDER on this very issue. 

Sadanand Bulbule on Feb 15, 2025

Dear Sirji

Whenevr I ask for a small glass of milk, always you are giving me a big can of fresh milk. Thank you for your passion for sharing best of the best solutions. 

KASTURI SETHI on Feb 15, 2025

Dear Sir,

This I have learnt from you, Sir. There is a proverbial truth that knowledge is power, if shared, otherwise tomorrow it will become outdated.

Your concerted efforts have yielded results. 

KALLESHAMURTHY MURTHY K.N. on Mar 11, 2025

Dear Sirs,

My submission for the query is that the period of 3 months counts from the date of communication or service of the order, as per Sec. 107 (1)

When it is appealed, the FAA has to look after the conditions before the issuance of acknowledgement in APL-02. Once the APL-02 is issued, it means that the appeal is admitted, and it cannot be ignored subsequently on second thought. When there is proof of the date of communication, saying it as time barred is prejudicial to Sec. 107(1).

 Further, rectification u/s 161 does not arise unless it is proved the mistakes are apparent on record.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues