Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Section 69(1) of CGST

Amit Sharma

If offence under sub section 4 of section 132 of GST is bailable and non-cognizable then why arrest is mandated in section 69(1) for offences made under a,b,c,d and punishable under (II) of subsection 1 or section 132 of CGST

Why Arrests Are Made Under CGST Act's Section 69(1) for Bailable, Non-Cognizable Offenses Explained A query was raised about why arrests are mandated under Section 69(1) of the CGST Act for certain offenses when these are bailable and non-cognizable under Section 132(4). A respondent explained that arrests under Section 69(1) are typically for interrogation, evidence preservation, and preventing witness tampering or flight risk. The decision to arrest is at the discretion of the Commissioner based on evidence of tax evasion. Bail decisions and punishments are determined by the judicial court. Additionally, individuals accused of cheating and forgery must be informed of the specific grounds for arrest beyond just an arrest memo. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues