Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

GST AUDIT U/S 65 AND SHOW CAUSE U/S 73

BARUN MUKHERJEE

Respected Sir,

Department has already conducted GST Audit u/s 65 and ADT-2 was issued accordingly for the F.Y. 2018-19 to 21-22. As per audit observation the taxpayer has already paid the tax along with applicable interest and penalty. Now Jurisdiction office has sent show cause notice u/s 73 for the F.Y. 2020-21. Is there any provision or notification by which proceeding u/s 73 can be dropped.

Taxpayer Challenges Show Cause Notice Issued Under Section 73 After Paying GST Dues; Questions Procedural Duplications A taxpayer underwent a GST audit under Section 65 for the fiscal years 2018-19 to 2021-22 and paid the due tax, interest, and penalty. Despite this, a show cause notice (SCN) under Section 73 was issued for the fiscal year 2020-21. A participant questioned the necessity of the SCN since the tax was paid before its issuance, noting that Section 73(8) does not require a penalty if payment is made timely. The discussion also highlighted potential procedural duplications and the possibility of invoking Sections 73 or 74 for unresolved issues post-audit. Participants advised contesting the penalty in the SCN response. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues