Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

WORKS CONTRACTORS - TDS DATA

giri gattupalli

respected sir,

in the light of insertion of sec 128A , please discuss this issue.

gst department has issued orders under SEC-74 during FY 2017-18,18-19,19-20 in the case of govt works contractors who did not disclose turnovers in GSTR-3B returns., based on data received from GSTR-7 returns (tds 2%) filed by contractee departments.

please let me know whether, in above conditions orders under sec 73 or sec 74 sustainable under GST law or not.

thanking you sir

Debate on Applying Section 74 of GST Act for Contractors' Non-Disclosure in GSTR-3B: Intent vs. Unintentional Errors A discussion on a forum involves a query about the applicability of Section 74 of the GST Act for government works contractors who failed to disclose turnover in GSTR-3B returns, based on data from GSTR-7 returns. The main issue is whether orders under Section 74 are sustainable or if they should fall under Section 73. Several participants argue that Section 74 is applicable due to the suppression of facts, while others suggest that unintentional non-disclosure could contest the invocation of Section 74. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proving intent and the correct filing of accounts. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues