Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Custom duty

Jasbir Uppal

Dear Professional brothers & Sisters

My client has import the goods during the financial year 2018-19 from out of Indian Territory, after verification of goods by the custom authority as assessed the duty my client has paid (IGST) @12% and custom authority released the goods. Now after more the six year custom authority issued a notice to my client on the grounds that you have liable to pay duty @ 18%. After inspection of the file of the department there is no any sample of goods attested in the file. Can after such a long time can department asked to pay the difference of duty when the sample of goods also not on file.

With regards

J.S. Uppal

Customs Demand 6 Years Later: Can IGST Be Increased Retroactively Without Fraud Evidence? Check Legal Time Limits. A client imported goods in the fiscal year 2018-19 and paid a 12% IGST as assessed by customs authorities. Six years later, customs issued a notice demanding an 18% IGST, citing a discrepancy. The client seeks advice on whether the department can demand the difference after such a long period, especially without evidence of fraud or suppression. Responses suggest checking if any notifications amended the IGST rate retrospectively and highlight the statutory time limits for issuing such notices. The discussion also emphasizes the need for detailed information on the goods and classifications used. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues