Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Scruitiny of Returns

VENU K

Sec 73(1)

Where it appears to the proper officer...........

So when a notice is issued demanding tax for violation of say 16(4) straight away under Sec 73 is it possible to argue that

To Appear anything to officer an investigation or assessment is required. The department cannot straight away launch Demand and Recovery mechanisms.

In this case16(4) violation can APPEAR to Officer only after undertaking a scrutiny of returns. So ASMT 10 proceedings are mandatory before initiating Sec 73(1). The officer has to follow the due process and cannot skip the process.

Debate on GST and Section 73(1) Notice Issuance Without Prior Scrutiny: Necessity of Compliance with Section 16(4) Discussed A discussion on the Goods and Services Tax (GST) focuses on whether a notice under Section 73(1) can be issued without prior scrutiny of returns, specifically regarding violations of Section 16(4). One participant argues that scrutiny is necessary before issuing a demand notice, while others contend that if a violation is apparent from the returns, a notice can be issued directly. The debate includes references to legal precedents and interpretations of GST rules, with differing opinions on whether procedural steps like issuing Form ASMT-10 are mandatory. The discussion also touches on the principles of natural justice and due process in tax assessments. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues