Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

ITC of FY 2017-18 blocked

SUSHIL BANSAL

Dear experts,

our client purchased goods from a supplier in the FY 2017-18.Now the registration of the supplier cancelled by the department from the date which is before our purchase date and our ITC blocked by the department on dated 30.4.2024.My querry is whether this action of the department is legally valid as we have not been issued any show cause notice & the time limit of notice u/s 73/74 has already expired.

Client Challenges Retrospective Cancellation of ITC Due to Supplier's GST Status; Considers Appeal Under Rule 86A, Sections 73/74 A client faced blocked Input Tax Credit (ITC) for FY 2017-18 after their supplier's GST registration was retrospectively canceled. The client questioned the legality of this action, as they received no show cause notice (SCN) and the time limit for such notice had expired. Respondents advised that retrospective cancellation without proper notice is often challenged successfully in courts, and suggested filing an appeal or writ petition. They discussed relevant legal provisions, such as Rule 86A and Sections 73/74, and emphasized the importance of proving genuine transactions and the absence of fraud for ITC entitlement. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues