Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

gst rule 96(10)

KANHAIYA AGRAWAL

we received the goods from the foreign customer for the job work purposes under advance authorisation .

After completion of the job work we sent (export) it back to our customer after charging the job charges .

we cleared this transaction under gst as with payment of tax option on job work charges and also got the refund of gst.

Now the department is asking to pay the gst refund granted to us as this is hited by GST rule 96(10).

Can you please guide me on whether rule 96(10) of GST Act is applicable or not.

Debate on GST Rule 96(10): Tax Department Demands Refund Repayment; Exporters Discuss Legal Challenges and Potential Writ Petitions. A discussion on GST Rule 96(10) involves a company that received goods from a foreign customer for job work under advance authorization, exported them back after charging for the job work, and claimed a GST refund. The tax department demands repayment, citing Rule 96(10). Participants in the forum debate the rule's applicability, noting pending writ petitions and stays granted by some High Courts. The rule restricts exporters from claiming IGST refunds if they have availed specified benefits. One participant suggests the rule is ultra vires and advises considering a writ challenge if the amount involved is substantial. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues