Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Adhoc demand of GST on indirect expenses in GST scrutiny

VENKAT S

In GST assessment for FY 17-18, the AO has raised a demand of 18% on a portion of indirect expenses but no reference to the act/rule under which the demand is raised is mentioned.
Is this allowed? if this order to be appealed, then what grounds of appeal are available to the assessee?

The extract from the order is :

' The tax payer has furnished the abstract details of other expenses for Rs ______. The details are verified and accepted except the following expenses which are disallowed.

Repairs to building Rs 435482 Tax payable @ 18% - Rs 78386

Repairs to machinery Rs 351719 Tax payable @ 18% - Rs 63309 '


Any suggestions or guidance is welcomed.

Debate Over 18% GST Demand for FY 2017-18: Lack of Legal Basis Sparks Calls for Appeal and Legal Compliance. In a discussion forum, participants addressed an issue regarding a GST assessment for FY 2017-18 where an assessing officer demanded 18% GST on certain indirect expenses without citing relevant legal provisions. Contributors debated the legality of such an order, suggesting it could be appealed due to its lack of legal references, potentially rendering it invalid. They criticized the trend of issuing orders without proper legal basis, attributing it to revenue-driven motives. Participants emphasized the importance of adhering to legal standards and the principles of natural justice, expressing frustration with the current tax administration practices. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues