Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

EXPORT FIRM MATTER

Dilipkumar Sharma

Dear All,

An export firm filed returns of 2022-23 under rate of 12% instead of 18%. The GSTR-1 invoice filed was under IGST Paid and as such the refund of same amount was received @12% only. The firm came under GST Audit by dept. and now the AO is asking to pay the difference of 6% of IGST tax as it was not correctly shown at the time of filing GSTR-1.

Issue is now what will happen to the tax amount if paid now ? As no revenue loss to Govt. in this matter as IGST was less paid and same amount of refund was received.

Please suggest in the matter and suggest remedy as per law if any.

Export Firm Faces GST Audit for Filing Error, Seeks Penalty Waiver Under Section 126, Considers Appeal Options An export firm mistakenly filed returns for 2022-23 at a 12% GST rate instead of the correct 18%, resulting in a refund at the lower rate. During a GST audit, authorities demanded payment of the 6% difference. One respondent suggested that since this is a procedural error, only a penalty under Section 125 of the CGST Act could be imposed, and recommended seeking a penalty waiver under Section 126. Another advised appealing to higher authorities or pursuing relief through the Tribunal or High Court. A practical solution proposed was to pay the difference with interest and apply for a refund. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
KASTURI SETHI on Feb 28, 2024

It being a procedural lapse only, the demand cannot be raised. Only penalty is imposable under Section 125 of CGST Act.

The best recourse is, you should take shelter of Section 126 for waiver of penalty.

Dilipkumar Sharma on Feb 28, 2024

Thanks a lot for reply Kasturiji. This is what was explained to the officers but they are not ready to understand anything and is asking to pay the difference of tax @6% which comes to approx 5.00 lakh. Also no refund of same amount will be given. Can you suggest any more information so same can be again explained to the officers ?

KASTURI SETHI on Feb 28, 2024

(i) Write to the jurisdictional Commissioner and convey your problem in person. Govt. is liberal regarding the export.

(ii) Your firm has earned foreign exchange for our country by exporting goods, you have worked in the interest of Indian Economy and, in turn, in the interest of our nation.

Technicalities should not be a stumbling block.

Shilpi Jain on Mar 2, 2024

In case you get a notice you may get relief at Tribunal (if it is set up)/HC level.

Dept officers sometimes look only one track and do not understand that this is a revenue neutral situation.

Raam Srinivasan Swaminathan Kalpathi on Mar 2, 2024

Another option available is to remit the difference IGST of 6% with applicable interest under Sec.50 and then claim refund by either filing a manual application under Rule 97A or make an application under 'Other' category in the portal.  Form RFD-01.  

Padmanathan KV on Mar 8, 2024

I agree with the view of Sri RaamSrinivas Kalpathi sir. It would be more practical. The refund should not be denied as it is within time limit also.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues