Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

ITC wrongly availed & penalty levied

RAGHAV SHARMA

Respected Members,

One of my client has claimed the excess CGST of Rs 3714 and SGST 3714 in the Financial Year 2018-2019 due to an accounting error. The department has issued the form DRC-01. In the DRC-01, the Proper officer calculated the Penalty of 10000 for each CGST and SGST. How far it is valid to calculate the penalty at 10000 for each CGST and SGST when the total ITC to be reversed is 7428? Kindly guide me in this matter

Thanks

Client Faces Rs 20,000 Penalty for Excess GST Claim; Debate on Mandatory Penalties Under Sections 73(9) and 126 A client mistakenly claimed excess CGST and SGST totaling Rs 7,428 due to an accounting error for the financial year 2018-2019. The tax department issued a penalty of Rs 10,000 each for CGST and SGST under form DRC-01. One respondent explained that according to Section 73(9) of the CGST Act, the penalty is the higher of 10% of the tax or Rs 10,000. Another respondent suggested that penalties might not be mandatory for minor breaches under Section 126, and recommended contesting the penalty. A third respondent supported this viewpoint, indicating potential legal arguments against the penalty. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues