Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

regardin section 16(2)(c)

FARIDUDDIN AHMAD

one of my client received intimation u/s 61 for the period 2019-20 requiring to deposit tax of Rs-104976/- due to non filing of GSTR 3B by the supplier. it has also been mention in the intimation that the assesse has done voilation of section 16(2)(c). however ITC is reflected in GSTR-2A but the supplier has not filied its GSTR-3B till the date of issue of ASMT-10. kindly advise what to do.

Notice Issued Under Section 61 for 2019-20 Demanding Tax Despite ITC in GSTR-2A; Supreme Court Ruling Cited A client received a notice under Section 61 for the 2019-20 period, demanding tax payment due to the supplier's failure to file GSTR-3B, despite ITC being reflected in GSTR-2A. Respondents advised referencing a recent Supreme Court judgment in a similar case, though interpretations vary. Some officials dismiss the judgment due to the low amount involved, while others argue for a broader understanding of the case's context. It is suggested to challenge the demand through replies or appeals, as outcomes can differ based on case specifics. The discussion highlights the need for clarity from tax authorities. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues