Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

RCM on transportation due to wrong reporting by GTA

SUSHIL BANSAL

Dear experts,

My client sold goods to unregistered recepient.Freight paid by the recepient.But the transporter(GTA) while filing GSTR-1 ticked ' GST payable on RCM' & mentioned GST no.of our client.Now while doing GST audit the department is asking for RCM on this transaction.Plz guide how we are liable for such RCM & how to pleade for that.

Client Not Liable for RCM on Freight Due to Incorrect GTA Marking, Per Notification No. 13/2017 A client sold goods to an unregistered recipient, who paid the freight. However, the transporter (GTA) incorrectly marked the transaction as 'GST payable on RCM' under the client's GST number. During a GST audit, the department demanded RCM payment from the client. An expert advised that the client was neither the payer nor liable for the freight, and thus not responsible for RCM under Notification No. 13/2017. Another expert concurred but suggested verifying the arrangement between the client and GTA to determine the correct recipient. The incorrect invoice cannot justify RCM liability on the client. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Amit Agrawal on Dec 2, 2023

Kindly put on record that 'Your client was neither the who paid nor the one who was liable to pay subject freight for the transportation of goods by road in goods carriage' and hence, he was not service receiver of subject services under dispute.

And therefor, your client is not liable to pay GST under RCM in terms of Serial No. 1 of Notification No. 13/2017- Central Tax (Rate) read with Explanation (a) given therein.

Just because supplier of service has wrongly issued invoice in your client's name - showing RCM liability - cannot be legally valid reason to levy GST under RCM upon your client. Mistake made by the supplier cannot be reason to levy GST on a person who is not even the recipient of subject service. Furthermore, as filing of Form GSTR-2 & 3 were never made operational, your client was in no position to challenge the correctness of said invoice over GST portal.

These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice / suggestion.

Padmanathan KV on Dec 2, 2023

I broadly agree with views of Amit Ji. But, i am not able to understand how the transporter (GTA) has given the GSTIN of your client.

According to Sec 2(93) “recipient” of supply of goods or services or both, means–

(a) where a consideration is payable for the supply of goods or services or both, the person who is liable to pay that consideration;

Thus recipient is not the person who actually pays but the one who is liable to pay.

It appears to me that the actual arrangement/contracts etc between the GTA and your client has to be verified to determine who is the "recipient".

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues