Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

EPC contract for solar power plant

K Balasubramanian

There is an option available to pay taxes on 70% of Gross Consideration for materials and 30% of gross consideration on Services @ 18%. Is this facility optional or mandatory?? Notification number 08/2021 Central taxes (Rate) dated 30/09/2021 refers

Debate on GST Application for Solar EPC Contracts: Is 70/30 Tax Split Mandatory or Optional Under CGST Act, 2017? A discussion on the application of Goods and Services Tax (GST) to an EPC contract for a solar power plant raised questions about whether the option to pay taxes on 70% of the gross consideration for materials and 30% for services at 18% is mandatory or optional. One participant clarified that if specific conditions are met, this deemed value approach is mandatory. Another noted that this explanation does not override other sections of the CGST Act, 2017. Additionally, it was mentioned that this method of deemed valuation and tax rate is currently under legal challenge in a high court. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues