Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 118816
Like 0 Bookmark

SCN u/s 74 for penalty only..whether valid?

Date 20 Oct 2023
Replies 7 Replies
Views 3949 Views
Section 74 penalty invoked where mens rea plus short payment or wrongful ITC claimed, affecting scope of SCN and remedies.
Whether invoking Section 74 in a show cause notice is appropriate where allegations include wrongful passing of input tax credit without actual supply and alleged short payment/non declaration of outward supplies; the SCN's conflation of penalty proposals and recovery under Section 74 raises issues about the statutory fit of Section 74, availability of reduced penalty mechanisms, mens rea requirements, and whether drafting defects affect entitlement to concessional treatment. (AI Summary)

Dear friends,

I am giving text of one SHOW CAUSE NOTICE. At the top of this no section etc mentioned.

2. It appears that the taxable person has passed on GST credit amounting to Rs. 900000 as the taxable person has only issued GST invoices and passed on ITC to the recipients without actual supply of the underlying goods in contravention of section 7 of the CGST Act 2017,& hence liable to be penalized under section 122(1)(ii).

3. Further, the taxable person appears to have short paid tax amounting to Rs. 1,50,000/- as E-way bills were generated for invoices as detailed , these invoices were not declared as the outward supply in GSTR 1 returns, nor the tax was deposited in the returns of GSTR 3B against such supplies in contravention of section 7, section 9(1), section 37 of the CGST Act 2017. The tax amounting to Rs. 1,50,000- appears to be recoverable under section 74,Int u/s 50,penalty u/s 122(1)(i)

4. In the view of the above, it is clear that the taxpayer has willfully suppressed the facts with intend to claim refund of fraudulent ITC so obtained. Therefore, provisions of section 74 are invokable in this case.

I need your advice on following:

1.at point No 4 the SCN is talking about invoking of 74, whether this is with regard to both the point i.e. 2nd & 3rd.If yes, then whether the SCN u/s 74 can be issued for recovery of penalty only as in point No.2nd it is asking for penalty u/s 122(1)(ii) only.

2. Further in point No.3rd it is stated that we have “short paid tax” whereas in point No. 4 is is stated that “the taxpayer has willfuly suppressed the facts with intend to claim refund of fraudulent ITC so obtained.” In my view both are contradictory.

Plz guide

7 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues