Is right to catch and carry fish included in the definition of immovable property under general clause act?
Does immovable property include rights also.
Poornima Gupta
Debate on Whether Fishing Rights Qualify as Immovable Property Under General Clauses Act, Referencing Supreme Court Rulings A discussion on whether the right to catch and carry fish is considered immovable property under the General Clauses Act. One participant argues that it qualifies as 'profit a prendre,' citing a Supreme Court decision in Anand Behera v. State of Orissa, which regards such rights as immovable property in India. Another participant references The Law Lexicon, stating that the right to fish in another's waters is considered immovable property, as it is a benefit arising from the land. Both participants agree on the interpretation, with references to various legal cases supporting their views. (AI Summary)