Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Amount paid to Director

Kaustubh Karandikar

Amount paid by XYZ Pvt. Ltd. to Mr. PQR (Proprietor – ABC) towards Repairs & Service Charges and Labour Charges and ABC paid GST on it. Mr. PQR is also a director of XYZ Pvt. Ltd. Any GST implication to XYZ Pvt. Ltd. since PQR is director of XYZ Pvt. Ltd. and proprietor of ABC?

XYZ Pvt. Ltd. not liable for GST under Reverse Charge Mechanism for services by director-proprietor Mr. PQR. XYZ Pvt. Ltd. paid Mr. PQR, a director and proprietor of ABC, for repairs and service charges, with GST paid by ABC. The main concern is whether XYZ Pvt. Ltd. has any GST liability under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) due to Mr. PQR's dual roles. Responses indicate no RCM liability for XYZ, as the services were provided by Mr. PQR as a proprietor, not as a director. Transactions between XYZ and ABC should be at Open Market Value (OMV) due to their related-party status, and the recent circular clarifies no RCM applies in this context. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues