Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

SEC 50 ; CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY

giri gattupalli

respected sir,

as a settled rule by supreme court' INTEREST IS COMPESATORY IN NATURE' and till now this position continues , and as per GST LAW delayed payment made by crediting electronic credit ledger , and as there is no loss of money to exchequer , how SEC 50 OF GST ACT come in to play. please share your opinions. whether any one challenged this issue ? if yes please share inputs. our eminent panel discussions are very educative to me.

thanking you

giri

tax advocate

Debate on Section 50 GST Act: Interest on Delayed Tax Payments Valid Despite Credit Ledger Balance, Likely Constitutional. A discussion on the constitutional validity of Section 50 of the GST Act revolves around the compensatory nature of interest on delayed tax payments. A tax advocate questions the applicability of interest when tax dues are settled using the electronic credit ledger, arguing no financial loss to the exchequer. Respondents clarify that interest is levied on unpaid taxes due by the deadline, and the GST law mandates interest on cash payments post-proceedings under Sections 73 or 74. The consensus is that interest applies despite sufficient credit ledger balance, and challenging this on constitutional grounds is unlikely to succeed. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues