Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID : 118654
- 0 -

Consultancy Fees to doctors from firm - treatment

Date 19 Jul 2023
Replies3 Answers
Views 3012 Views
Asked By

Dear Experts,

A partnership firm (all the partners are doctors) runs a hospital, and paid consultancy fee to partners for their services in the hospital; this consultancy fee is paid apart from allowable remuneration under the income tax act. Is this allowed in the income tax act?

Please refer to any case law, if possible.

Thanks in advance

3 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
- 0
Replied on Jul 19, 2023
1.

Consultancy fee as a practicing doctor and remuneration as per partnership deed is allowable and tenable as per law

- 0
Replied on Jul 19, 2023
2.

The consultancy fee and remuneration both put together will considered for limit under section 40(b) of IT Act.

In my opinion, the consultancy will also be covered under "remuneration" in section 40(b).

You may also refer to COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VERSUS PACKWELL (KARNATAKA) INDUSTRIES 2003 (11) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court.

- 0
Replied on Jul 19, 2023
3.

In continuation,

Just reproducing a very important para from above judgement:-

On principle as well, it is not possible to accept the argument that the statutory prohibition is to be ignored or diluted by regarding a partner to whom remuneration is paid as a person who besides being a partner is something more or something different when he deals with the firm. A partner in a firm is very much a partner and it is that status which defines his rights and also imposes on him the obligation to render all the services that he is capable of for the advancement of the objects of the firm. Such a person cannot seek to avoid the effect of the prohibition made in the statute by describing himself as an expert. Any expertise that he may possess is required to be made available to the firm as a partner and even if remuneration therefor is permissible in terms of the partnership deed, nevertheless, having regard to the statutory provision which prevailed until the law was amended in 1992, payment so made cannot be regarded as being items of expenditure so far as the firm is concerned. The question is answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues