Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Refund under inverted duty structure

Kaustubh Karandikar

In the formula of refund under inverted duty structure, the taxable person had considered the turnover of both manufactured and trading items and ITC of both manufacturing and trading items. The GST authorities had objected saying that figures of trading items cannot be considered in this formula. Views of the experts please.

Debate on GST Refund: Should Trading Turnover Be Included in Inverted Duty Structure Calculations? A discussion on a forum addressed a query regarding the refund process under the inverted duty structure in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) system. The issue centered on whether turnover and input tax credit (ITC) from both manufacturing and trading activities should be included in the refund formula. The GST authorities objected to including trading figures, arguing that trading does not involve an inverted duty structure. Various experts provided opinions, suggesting that while GST law does not differentiate between manufacturing and trading, the inclusion of trading turnover depends on specific circumstances, such as rate differences between inputs and outputs. The consensus was that the authorities' stance might not be legally tenable, but further clarification and case law might be needed. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues