Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

REGARDING INTIMATION U/S 61

FARIDUDDIN AHMAD

one of my client received intimation u/s 61 for the period 2019 20 issued by learned A.C 2 bearing reference no abc on 23/07/2022 reply to which has not been filed. later D.C-2 again issued the intimation u/s 61 for the period 2019 20 on 29/05/2023 bearing reference no xyz on same issue.

kindly advise to which intimation u/s 61 reply has to be file.

Client Urged to Respond to GST Act Section 61 Intimations from 2019-20 to Avoid Penalties and Allegations A client received two intimations under Section 61 of the GST Act for the period 2019-20, with the first issued in July 2022 and the second in May 2023. The client has not responded to the first intimation. It was advised to respond to the latest intimation, referencing the earlier one and clarifying that both address the same issue. It was emphasized that all government communications should be replied to promptly to avoid penalties or allegations of fraud. Providing a genuine reason for the delay in responding to the first intimation was also suggested. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Padmanathan KV on Jun 6, 2023

Are the issues in both intimation one and the same?

FARIDUDDIN AHMAD on Jun 6, 2023

both the issue are same

Padmanathan KV on Jun 6, 2023

Reply to the latest one. Out of abundant caution, you can make a reference to the earlier intimation as well and state that issue in both intimations are one and the same and hence covered by your reply.

KASTURI SETHI on Jun 7, 2023

I support the views of Sh.Padamanathan Kollengode Ji. I add that no communication from the Govt. office should remain un-replied otherwise penalty is imposable even for non-submission of reply/information. First intimation remain un-replied for almost one year. Such inordinate delay shows non-caring attitude of an assessee.

Shilpi Jain on Jun 8, 2023

Not responding to the communication issued u/s 61 could also lead to a demand notice alleging fraud, suppression, etc.

So reply at the earliest to the communication and if possible also mention a genuine reason for not having responded to the first communication, in the reply.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues