Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

CDNR-AMENDMENT NOT DECLARE IN GSTR-1

ABHILASH PANICKER

Dear Sir,

In 18-19, we forget to update CDNR-Amendment in Some Invoices (Price Reduction ) in GSTR-1., but we adjust the same in GSTR-3B., (Documents pertaining to CDNR Available with us )

Request you to please guide wether we have recd any notice from GST Deptt for the GAP Between GSTR-1 & GSTR-3B.,

Credit-note nondisclosure risks GST scrutiny; secure evidence of recipient ITC reversal and reconcile via returns. Non-disclosure of amended credit-notes in GSTR-1 while adjusting tax in GSTR-3B requires proof that recipients reversed proportionate ITC per the proviso to Section 34(2) and that supplier adjusted tax within permitted time. Taxpayers should produce credit-note copies, recipient CA certification of ITC reversal, ledger statements, and any corrective returns (eg, GSTR-9) to substantiate conformity and avoid scrutiny. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Amit Agrawal on May 23, 2023

You need to produce supporting evidences to the effect that recipient had reversed proportionate ITC against your credit-notes (towards price-reduction along-with GST thereon) as envisioned in proviso to Section 34 (2).

Considering the failure to disclose these credit-notes in From GSTR-1, it would be advisable to have strong supporting evidences specially coming from recipient's end (say, supporting CA certificate at the end of recipient of subject credit-notes & supporting ledger statements).

This is also subject to a presumption that you have adjusted such tax-amount - while filing From GSTR-3B for the month/s - within the time permitted in Section 34 (2).

These are ex facie views of mine, the same should not be construed as professional advice / suggestion.

Padmanathan KV on May 23, 2023

Agreed to Amit Ji's views in toto. produce the following:-

1. Copy of the credit note

2. Certificate from CA of recipient to stating that credit pertaining to credit note has been reversed.

3. If you have corrected in GSTR-9, copy of GSTR-9

Shilpi Jain on May 28, 2023

There have been a few High Court decisions which have been in favour of the assessees when these kind of errors have happened. So this miss should be considered as a procedural error or mistake and should be allowed to be adjusted.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues