Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID : 118526
- 0 -

Own weighbridge & Transport Vehicle

Date 15 May 2023
Replies4 Answers
Views 2480 Views
Asked By

Dear sir/madam,

The dealer is supplier of iron & steel. They have their own weighbridge & transport vehicles. During blocking of credit under rule 86A, the authorities are not considering their inward movement of goods from supplier stockyard due their own weighbridge receipt & transportation documents. Pls suggest how to contend with this issue.

Thanks in advance.

4 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
- 0
Replied on May 15, 2023
1.

Merely for reason of using own weighbridge & transport vehicles - while transporting goods - cannot be 'sole' reason for blocking of credit under rule 86A.

It appears that ITC is blocked on the ground that ITC is availed without receipt of goods.

And as per Section 155, where any person claims that he is eligible for input tax credit under this Act, the burden of proving such claim shall lie on such person.

So, person availing ITC needs to prove that subject goods are actually received by him with corroborative evidences (which can be from the end of supplier of goods and at the end of recipient).

One needs to go through contents of order issued u/r 86A (1) and also, see available evidences (i.e. any addition to having own weighbridge & transport vehicles), before commenting on actual defence strategy.

These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice / suggestion.

- 0
Replied on May 15, 2023
2.

The department cannot simply disregard own weighbridge receipt and transport document without establishing that they are actually fake. It is a common business practice to have own weighbridge and vehicle and that by itself does not indicate that transportation has not take place.

The weighbridge usually have stamping, passing and calibration certificate from State legal metrology department/ authorized agencies. Also the weighbridge receipts have timestamping as well.

Moreover, toll charges receipts/ FASTag entry, vehicle logbook, driver's statement, loading/unloading charges paid, gatepass, etc... can be also used to corroborate. In one case, we have used CCTV footage, which was ultimately accepted by the officer.

- 0
Replied on May 20, 2023
3.

A good case to file Writ in the High Court.

- 0
Replied on May 20, 2023
4.

This is assuming that the transactions in question are genuine and there are other evidences to prove the same.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues