Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

investigation u/s 67

FARIDUDDIN AHMAD

sir search and seizure proceedings u/s 67 has been done on 05/12/2022 by the SIB UPSGST officials. however jurisdiction of the firm pertain to CGST department. later UPSGST department issued summon u/s 70 requiring the tax payer to produce books of accounts from the period 1 july 2017 to 5/12/2022. however the seizure does not contain any documents related to 1 july 2017 to 5/12/2022. seizure only contain the stock lying in the factory. kindly clarify that can the UPSGST office undertake the proceedings u/s 67 and for how many previous years records can be submitted.

Jurisdiction of UPSGST in Search & Seizure under Section 67 GST Act Questioned; Clarification on Authority Needed A forum discussion addresses a query about the jurisdiction and authority of the UPSGST officials conducting search and seizure under Section 67 of the GST Act. The inquiry involves a case where UPSGST officials conducted proceedings despite the firm's jurisdiction falling under the CGST department. The officials issued a summons for records from July 1, 2017, to December 5, 2022, although the seizure included only factory stock. Responses clarify that state tax departments can initiate proceedings based on intelligence and highlight the need for Joint Commissioner authorization. The discussion also notes that information can be requested up to five years from the annual return due date. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues