Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 118473
Like 0 Bookmark

Non Genration of E-way Bill or genration of Incorrect E-Way bill , Impact on ITC

Date 08 Apr 2023
Replies 6 Replies
Views 3962 Views
E way bill error does not bar input tax credit when alternative documentary proof establishes movement of goods.
An incorrect or missing e way bill does not by itself negate entitlement to input tax credit because statutory ITC conditions do not mandate an e way bill; however, the e way bill is an important documentary proof of movement and genuineness. Taxpayers should use the bill to/ship to model where applicable and preserve alternative evidence - purchase orders, invoices, payment records, transport and loading receipts, stock records or third party confirmations - to substantiate actual movement when the e way bill is erroneous. (AI Summary)

A Trader situated in Nagpur ordered Goods from Mumbai and ask mumbai based vendor to generate the E-Way bill from Mumabi to Nagpur.

But he has general practis of delivering the same goods from Pune only. Here Nagpur based Taxpayer generate 2nd E-way bill mentioning travel route Nagpur to Pune though actual goods route was Mumbai to Pune.

Is 2nd E-Way bill generated is valid one? what impact on ITC of Pune Dealer?

6 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues