Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

regarding wrong payment IGST Tax

FARIDUDDIN AHMAD

respected sir, my issue is that IGST Liability of Rs-230000/- for the month of Nov 2017 due to mistake has been paid to CGST Rs-115000/- and SGST Rs-115000/-. SCN U/s 74 to deposit short payment of IGST Rs-230000/- has been issued. can the wrong payment to CGST and SGST of IGSTbe allowed

Taxpayer Mistakenly Pays IGST as CGST and SGST, Faces Shortfall Notice Under Section 74; Experts Advise Corrective Steps. A user raised a query about mistakenly paying IGST as CGST and SGST for November 2017, leading to a shortfall notice under Section 74. Experts advised that the correct tax must be paid and a refund claimed for the wrongly paid amounts. They discussed legal precedents and sections of the GST and IGST Acts relevant to such errors, including Sections 19, 50, 74, and 77. Some experts highlighted potential challenges in claiming refunds due to procedural requirements and differences in interpretation, suggesting that the issue might not fit under Section 77. Legal judgments and a CBIC circular were referenced for guidance. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues