Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

ITC availment

Manoj Pradhan

Sir , if a manufacturer purchases raw material i.e. scrap for manufacture of finished goods namely MS rod clear scrap as such due to its damage or any other reason below the purchase price . Here , the manufacturer takes ITC on the higher price and sells it lower than purchase price . Please clarify whether the above manufacturer are liable to reverse ITC which could not be used in manufacturing and cleared as such . Thanks

No ITC reversal needed when selling damaged goods below purchase price if used in business; beware of frequent sales. A manufacturer inquired about the need to reverse Input Tax Credit (ITC) when selling goods below purchase price due to damage. Respondents clarified that under GST, tax is based on transaction value, not profit or loss, and no ITC reversal is required if goods are used in business activities. However, repeated transactions of this nature might trigger investigations. It was emphasized that transactions should be genuine and not between related parties to avoid disputes. The consensus was that ITC could be claimed unless the transactions appear ingenuine or are frequent. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues