Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsAppJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 118170
Like 0Bookmark

Input tax credit

Date 26 Sep 2022
Replies9 Replies
Views 2856 Views
Input tax credit eligibility when supplier reports B2C can be denied due to return mismatch; obtain supplier certification.
The issue is denial of Input Tax Credit where supplier-uploaded records show B2C reporting instead of B2B, causing a mismatch between the recipient's returns and auto-populated purchase data; practitioners recommend obtaining a supplier certificate confirming tax discharge and relying on administrative guidance that emphasizes verification of supplier tax payment rather than automatic reversal of recipient credit. (AI Summary)

Dear sir,

Applicant availed Input tax credit as per the invoices which is not reflected in 2A, Now received notice for payment of difference tax between 3B and 2A, applicant remitted the payments to supplier through cheques only. kindly support with case laws in this matter. Section 16 2(aa) is only effective from 01-01-2022 As per Finance Act 2021.

9 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Like 0
Replied on Sep 27, 2022
1.

Your query is not clear.

Like 0
Replied on Sep 27, 2022
2.

Yes, Sec 16(2)(aa) is made effective from. 01.01.2022 vide Notification 39/2021-CT dated 21.12.2021.

Like 0
Replied on Sep 27, 2022
3.

Pls elaborate your query.

Like 0
Replied on Sep 27, 2022
4.

Sir,

Notice issued for difference tax in between 2A and 3B for the years 2018-19 to 2021-22, ITC as per 2A is less and 3B is higher, these difference tax applicant is having invoices supplier uploaded as B2C instead of B2B hence not reflected in 2A and difference arise between 2A and 3B.

, in this situation is recipient eligible for ITC? please advice.

Like 0
Replied on Sep 29, 2022
5.

Please ask suppliers to provide a CA certificate stating that the supply has been reported as B2C in place of B2B. However, due GST on the supply has been remitted.

Reliance can be placed on Internal Circular No. CST /JC (HQ-5)/Scrutiny/Issues/File No- /B-1 dt 25.02.2022 on "Guidelines with respect to legal issues pertaining to return scrutiny for tax periods
2017-18 and 2018-19" issued by the Commissioner of State Tax, Government of Mahashratra.

Like 0
Replied on Sep 30, 2022
6.

It is hardship on the recipient taxpayer for the ITC has been denied to him. Department follows 2A and allows credit only if invoice appears in 2A.

Like 0
Replied on Oct 5, 2022
7.

Agree with Shyamji. Get a CA certificate of the supplier in the present case and close the dispute.

I also agree with the querist that the condition of matching is not required prior to 1.1.22 though this point of argument will be a long way of dispute which may have to go up to the Courts to settle.

Like 0
Replied on Dec 4, 2022
8.

Dear Mr.shyam,

Is there any similar circular issued by karnataka state / central government. Since I have one case pending in karnataka commercial court.

Thanks in Advance.

Like 0
Replied on Dec 4, 2022
9.

No such circular by Karnataka State. However, Circular issued by one state is equally applicable in other states. Benefit of the circular was extended in West Bengal in my own case.

Further, the Audit Manual of CBIC requires the auditor to verify the payment of tax from suppliers end for high value transactions in case of mismatch between 2A and 3B. Point is the manual do not require ITC reversal and is concerned only with discharge of tax by the supplier.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues