Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 118119
Like 0 Bookmark

Whether a principal is treated as manufacturer

Date 16 Aug 2022
Replies 8 Replies
Views 4774 Views
Principal liability under GST allows registered principals to claim inverted duty refunds despite manufacturing via job-workers.
A principal who engages job-workers remains the registered person responsible for GST liability and account maintenance; the job-work provisions do not require the principal to have manufacturing premises. Pre-GST authorities have treated principals or suppliers as manufacturers in suitable facts, and for purposes of claiming refund under the inverted duty structure the principal may file a refund claim irrespective of whether the process at the job-worker amounts to manufacture. Departments cannot demand conditions not laid down in law. (AI Summary)

Dear All

One client of ours doesn't own any factory, but undertakes 100% manufacturing done from job workers. The department is of the view as the assessee doesnot have any premises to undertake manufacture he cannot be treated as manufacturer to avail from refund under the inverted duty regime. Request the expert to share their views on the same.

Thank you

CA Yogesh Ashar

8 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues