Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

ITC of RCM paid on residential property w.e.f 18.7.22

Nikhil Virkar

Sir/ Madam, GST paid under RCM on residential flat by registered person w.e.f 18.7.22 and being in use by its employee, whether ITC is allowed to claim being a business expenditure? or will it be hit by provisions of Section 17 of CGST Act 2017

Debate Over ITC Eligibility for GST Under RCM on Employee Housing: Personal Use vs. Business Purpose Under Section 17(5) A discussion on a forum centered around whether Input Tax Credit (ITC) is allowable for Goods and Services Tax (GST) paid under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) for residential properties used by employees. One participant argued that such use is personal consumption, thus blocking ITC under Section 17(5) of the CGST Act. Another participant suggested that if the property serves business purposes, like a mini-office, ITC might be claimable, though this is contentious and risky. The debate also touched on changes in the law post-2019 and the complexities of interpreting Section 17(5) regarding employee use. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues