Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

whatsappJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

E-way Bill

THYAGARAJAN KALYANASUNDARAM

Dear Experts,

One of my clients has been sent goods worth more than Rs.1 lakh from their warehouse without issuing an e-way bill due to a mistake. However, he generated an e-invoice as per the notification issued by the government which accompanied the goods. While in transit the officer intercepted the vehicle and imposed a penalty of 200% on the value of the goods u/s 129 of GST Act,2017. Is there any way out to get the refund by filing an appeal? Also kindly provide any related citations.

Thanks in Advance.

E-way bill non-compliance triggers a substantial statutory penalty despite an accompanying e-invoice; appeal options appear limited. Transporting goods without an e-way bill, even where an e-invoice accompanies the consignment, attracts a statutory transit non-compliance penalty; the vehicle was intercepted and a penalty of 200% was imposed under section 129, and the advisory reply stated that the 200% penalty as imposed is correct. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Ganeshan Kalyani on Jul 17, 2022

Sir, as per section 129 the penalty of 200% levied is correct.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues