Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Rule 42 calculations

SARTHAK MITTAL

I have a query in respect of annual calculations of Rule 42.

Will adjustments of prior fiscal be de-considered while computing annual calculations of Rule 42 of current fiscal.

For instance for annual calculations of FY 21-22, will re-credit of ITC (In Sep'21 return) for FY 20-21 due to annual recalculations of Rule 42 be removed for the purpose of NET ITC?

ParticularsOption-1Option-2
ITC availed during FY 21-22100100
Re-credit of ITC pertaining to FY 20-21 in Sep'21 return due to 42-43 annual calc.1010
Total credit availed during FY 21-22110110
Exempt turnover/Total turnover10%10%
ITC to be reversed11 (10% of 110)10 (10% of 100)
ITC apportionment: include credits availed in the fiscal year for annual compliance, excluding amounts already apportioned. Annual Rule 42 calculations should generally include ITC credited to the Electronic Credit Ledger during the fiscal being reconciled, including re-credits posted in returns for prior-year credits, because apportionment is tied to the date of availment. If identical credit amounts were already apportioned under Rule 42 for the prior fiscal after actual turnover was finalised, those previously apportioned amounts should not be included again in the current fiscal's reversal. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
PAWAN KUMAR on Apr 14, 2022

Dear sir,

as per my view, the amount of ITC credited to ECL will be the net ITC for the year only.

in the above table, option 1 is correct.

Ganeshan Kalyani on Apr 14, 2022

Rule 42 would have been applied for Fy 2020-21 credit so now no need to include the same again.

SARTHAK MITTAL on Apr 14, 2022

But if we go by the wordings used in Rule 42, it says ITC for a 'Tax period' in monthly calculations.

So if we r calculating for a full fiscal, credit availed during fiscal should be considered. Moreover, re-credit of ITC of previous fiscal has been credited to ECL so shouldn't this also be considered for reversal

Ganeshan Kalyani on Apr 14, 2022

R 42(1)(a) states as below-

(a) the total input tax involved on inputs and input services in a tax period, be denoted as ‘T’;

read "in a tax period" in above rule.

You would have considered credit of fy 20-21 for rule 42 after fy is closed with actual turnover before sept. And any credit of fy 20-21 availed in sep21 you would have considered correct ratio. So again offering the credit taken in sep 21 for rule 42 is not required.

If you have not done so then consider credit taken in a financial year irrespective of the year to which the credit pertains to.

SARTHAK MITTAL on Apr 14, 2022

Agreed Ganesh Ji.

But this is not flowing from the wordings of the law. Therefore had raised the issue.

PAWAN KUMAR on Apr 15, 2022

Dear sir,

In case of preparing filing GSTR-9/9C, the credit which reflected in ECL is the ITC for that year only, so based on this itc of previous year is to be considered the claim of which has been made in books as well as in GST during current year. please guide

Shilpi Jain on Apr 17, 2022

There is no requirement in the law to correlate the credit with the month/year of usage. The reversal of credit in rule 42 is based on the date of availment.

This is also coming out from the circular on compensation cess refund where refund is allowed on the basis of the month in which it is availed.

Hence, keeping it simple, choose the 1st option.

SARTHAK MITTAL on Apr 17, 2022

Exactly...

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues