Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Interest on wrong ITC

Kaustubh Karandikar

XYZ had wrongly claimed ITC which they have reversed but without paying interest since in totality large amount of ITC is in balance to cover the ITC claimed. However, e.g. if ITC of CGST is wrongly claimed, in CGST sufficient balance is not available but is available in SGST and IGST to cover the wrong ITC. Are they required to pay interest in such situation for ITC on CGST?

Wrongly Claimed ITC Reversal: No Interest Required If Overall ITC Balance Exists, Says High Court Decision A discussion on a forum regarding Goods and Services Tax (GST) addressed whether interest is required on wrongly claimed Input Tax Credit (ITC) that has been reversed, given that there is sufficient ITC balance in other categories. A participant clarified that no interest is liable if there is an overall ITC balance, citing a High Court decision. The case referenced was M/S Radheshyam Spinning Pvt Ltd versus Union of India. Other participants expressed gratitude for the clarification and citation provided. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues