Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 117761
Like 0 Bookmark

GST Order Passed

Date 17 Jan 2022
Replies 5 Replies
Views 1396 Views
GSTR-2A discrepancy may trigger GST liability notices; remedy is appeal and verification of taxpayer books and hearing.
GSTR-2A mismatches prompted an assessment treating unrecorded entries as suppressed purchases subject to tax, penalty and interest even though the recipient had no purchase invoices or credit claimed in GSTR-3B; auto-populated GSTR-2A is not conclusive and the department must establish purchases by evidence and verify the taxpayer's books, with remedies including production of accounts, seeking a hearing and filing the statutory appeal if the order was passed without proper notice. (AI Summary)

Dear Experts,

One of my clients got a notice from the GST authority stating that, my client's GSTR-2A purchases were showing some purchases which the seller has not paid the tax and no movement of goods were involved. Based on this notice, I have checked with my client records, there are no purchase bills and no credit was taken in GSTR-3B during the financial year. Accordingly, I have replied to the concerned authority, the purchases which were reflected in my client's GSTR-2A & your notice were neither recorded in their books of accounts nor availed any credit and no transactions between the parties so far.

Even, after receipt of my reply, the concerned authority because it is showing in my client's GSTR-2A, therefore its suppression of purchase hence liable to pay @ 18% and penalty u/s 74 and interest 50 of GST Act accordingly order was passed.

Thanks in Advance.

5 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Like 0
Replied on Jan 17, 2022
1.

Sir,

since the order is already passed the only remedy available is to file statutory appeal to the appellate authority. Whether the original authority provided you a personal hearing? If so have you produced your book of accounts to prove your stand. Mere mis-match between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A cannot fasten any liability on you. Based on evidence the Department is bound to establish some purchases which the seller has not paid the tax and no movement of goods were involved. You do not have any control on your seller to compel him to pay the tax promptly. It is for the Department to take action agains the seller..

Like 0
Replied on Jan 17, 2022
2.

Order-in-Original passed without service of SCN and without affording opportunity for personal hearing will be set aside by the Appellate Authority at the first instance. I think this has happened due lack of knowledge. It is a clear-cut case of violation of principles of natural justice. Auto-populated GSTR 2A is not final. It is subject to physical verification of the books of account maintained by the tax-payer/assessee.

Like 0
Replied on Jan 17, 2022
3.

Dear Experts,

Thank you so much for your valuable reply.

Like 0
Replied on Jan 18, 2022
4.

Sir, please check your email account. The officer must have sent you a normal mail seeking reason for the difference. Thereafter a notice via email granting an opportunity for personal hearing would have been given to you. Previously, when we use to visit department we were fully aware about the development of the case. Now a day in the online communication mode it became slightly difficult to keep track of the proceedings. Need to keep track of online mode of communicaiton as well.

Like 0
Replied on Jan 18, 2022
5.

Dear Mr. Ganeshan Kalyani,

Yes, you're absolutely correct sir. I will ask my client to check their email communication sir.

Thanks for your valuable reply.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues