Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Place of supply in case of builder

Rajesh Kumar

sir/ madam,

A builder is registered in Haryana and Providing construction service in Delhi. As per GSTR-3B returns of Haryana, he is charging IGST, is it correct in the purview of place of supply ? Should he taken Registration in Delhi for the construction in Delhi ?

If its a wrong practice, then what will be the effect on ITC which availed against the invoices used in Delhi ? What will be effect of tax paid by him in the head of IGST ?

Debate on Builder's IGST Charging Practice: Is Delhi Registration Necessary for Compliance with Place of Supply Rules? A builder registered in Haryana provides construction services in Delhi and charges IGST according to Haryana's GSTR-3B returns. The discussion revolves around whether this practice is correct concerning the place of supply rules and if the builder should register in Delhi. Some participants argue that separate registration in Delhi is not required, citing an AAR Karnataka ruling. Others suggest that due to the nature of services and location, separate registration in Delhi is advisable to avoid complications with Input Tax Credit (ITC) and potential disputes with the Delhi Tax Department. The consensus leans towards the necessity of Delhi registration to safeguard business interests and compliance. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues