Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

What to do if i had claimed ITC of import goods in the head of all other ITC??

MAYANK MITTAL

I had claimed IGST of ₹ 84.00 Lakhs paid on import of goods wrongly as all other ITC in GSTR-3B for the month of November 2017. Now what to do to get it rectified as I have got a demand from CGST department for mismatch in GSTR-2A & 3B for the f.y. 2017-18. Please advise.

Mistaken IGST Claim in GSTR-3B Leads to CGST Demand; Discrepancy with GSTR-2A Under Scrutiny for FY 2017-18 An individual mistakenly claimed IGST of 84.00 Lakhs paid on imported goods under the wrong ITC category in GSTR-3B for November 2017, resulting in a demand from the CGST department due to a mismatch with GSTR-2A for the fiscal year 2017-18. One response advised filing a reply to the demand notice with supporting documents, emphasizing the correctness of the books of accounts. Another response referenced a High Court case, suggesting that a mere discrepancy between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B should not automatically result in a demand if the case is genuine. Rectification is possible post-adjudication. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues