Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Matching ITC with GSTR-2B even though GSTR-3B lately

Naviin Guptaa

Dear All,

My client is filing GSTR-3B after 6 months of due date along with interest and late fee, just wanted to clarify whether in this case also we need to match ITC with the data available in 2B of that month or we can go head and claim as ITC based on 2A (reflecting in 2B of that month and later months)?

In my opinion, as we have paid the taxes along interest and late fee, tax payer cannot be penalized for the act of supplier late filing.

Thanks in advance.

Debate on claiming Input Tax Credit using GSTR-2A data due to late GSTR-3B filings; challenges statutory time limits. A discussion on a GST forum revolves around the issue of matching Input Tax Credit (ITC) with GSTR-2B when GSTR-3B is filed late. A participant queries whether ITC can be claimed based on GSTR-2A data if GSTR-3B is delayed. Another contributor supports the idea, suggesting a challenge to the statutory time limitations, arguing that taxpayers should not suffer ITC loss due to suppliers' late filings. The discussion includes references to legal provisions and case law, with participants expressing appreciation for the guidance and knowledge shared by a prominent member. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues